The new 2028-2034 European financial framework and the CAP reform proposed by the European Commission 25 ESF+ funding disappears in the Commission's proposal for 2028-34. Member States are invited to ensure that 14% of the budget is allocated to measures that contribute to varying degrees (these degrees being defined A major renationalisation of European policies, reducing them to annexes to national policies and budgets in the annex to the draft regulation) to the objectives of the Social Fund. In addition, 43% of each Member State's NRPP financial envelope should be allocated to measures that contribute to the environmental effort (with degrees of environmental effort by type of measure defined in the annex to the regulation). In general, unless Member States significantlyincrease their national co-financingunder the national and regional partnership plan they will submit, they will find themselves in a situation where they will have to suspend or significantly reducefunding for certain measures outside the new scope of the CAP. Faced with these drastic reductions in European funding, the Commission emphasises the flexibility granted to Member States, as if each euro could be 'sold' several times for various measures. Furthermore, the Commission is crossing a turning point between common policies and the renationalisation of European policies. In general, unless Member States significantly increase their national co-financing under the national and regional partnership plans they will submit, they will find themselves in a situation where they will have to suspend or significantly reduce funding for certain measures outside the new scope of the CAP. POSEI measures will thus compete with cohesion, social, LEADER and other measures, and their funding will be More power for the European Commission, less for the European Parliament and the Agriculture Council With regard to the CAP, common European criteria for eligibility and access to aid (basic environmental rules, framework for aid and co-financing, funding to be allocated to different types of measures, etc.) are minimised and essentially referred back to compromised, given what would be an attempt to square the circle for Member States. Depending on the capacity of Member States and regions to mobilise or not additional national funds, POSEI could be strengthened in some countries The Commission is thus proposing to assume additional powers and negotiate bilaterally with each Member State, whereas currently the framework of the CAP and the measures implementing it are defined by the co-legislators ... frameworks to be defined by each Member State in its national and regional partnership plan, based on the recommendations that the Commission will be responsible for making. and regions or, conversely, be greatly reduced. The Commission's proposal upsets the current balance of clear, guaranteed and defined funding for each country, while also upsetting the balance of support between different countries. The Commission is thus proposing to assume additional powers and to negotiate bilaterally with each Member State, whereas currently the framework of the CAP and the measures implementing it are defined by the co-legislators (the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers). Under the Commission's plan, the European Parliament's role would be drastically reduced.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTgxOTE4Nw==